Clarifying tetrapod embryogenesis, a biologist’s reply by Antoine Vekris aka Oldcola est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Paternité-Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale-Partage des Conditions Initiales à l'Identique 3.0 Greece.
 | Oldcola on And the fun is going on! |
| » Academic pub… on time is telling | |
| Vincent Fleury a les… on Now, that’s a clari… | |
| Vincent Fleury et le… on geometry | |
| Vincent Fleury et le… on Oops 090616 |
morphogenic gene
How one comes to qualify a gene as morphogenic? Fleury didn’t included this information in his paper, neither in the text or the glossary despite his interest on morphogenesis. I’ve chosen to illustrate the concept using bicoid as it’s one of the examples used by the author.
Filed under: Notes | Tagged: bicoid, drosophila, morphogenic gene, omission | Leave a comment »
Clarifying tetrapod embryogenesis, a biologist's reply 