In the third section of the paper Fleury starts to display his incredulity of genetic explanations of developmental morphogenesis, concluding by p16, col2, §2:
The review presented here highlights that inductive cascades of unidirectional gradients of scalar quantities cannot explain morphogenesis.
The review is incomplete and often bogus,which explain why Fleury is reaching this conclusion.
Certainly a lot is to be discovered in the field of developmental biology, but also a lot is known and one can’t just ignore it just because it doesn’t fit his point of view.
For those unfamiliar with biology I will try to point gross errors (factual or conceptual) and propose more appropriate readings.
The rhetoric of Fleury’s argumentation will be discussed as well, as they are one of the most interesting elements of the paper and may help understanding his point of view more clearly than his knowledge of the subject.
An overview of what will be discussed.