Vekris : the antero-posterior construction of animals is bullshit, the induction of limbs by genes is bullshit, the colinearity of hox genes is bullshit, the selection of tetrapods by evolution is bullshit, the duplication of genes between hindlimbs and forelimbs is bullshit
and you now know it, better than anyone else.
Well, no, I don’t know it and cteappv certainly don’t explain it and it’s not by not providing evidence that anybody could support such claims. And “anybody” includes physicists.
But that little burst is quite informative, isn’t it? Clarifying the authors position in the scientific landscape.
Now, a lot more people know what Vincent Fleury believes.
There is only one point of interest for me, as it is my main disagreement with Fleury:
the selection of tetrapods by evolution is bullshit
Quite clear, received 5/5, thank you Dr Fleury.
Now, he certainly misread my comment, but that’s not news. Let’s continue with the science of cteappv; maybe with a small stop before that ;-)
Filed under: lol, thankx Tagged: | Clarifying tetrapod embryogenesis a physicist's point of view, Vincent Fleury